blog

3 Questions with BV Investment Partners’ Jonathan Holmes

October 22, 2020

Jonathan Holmes is the Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Compliance Officer for BV Investment Partners, a private equity firm based in Boston, Massachusetts. The firm invests in the business services and information technology services sectors.

We talked to Holmes about the shifting role of the CFO in private equity, and what keeps him up at night heading into 2021.

Q: You wear multiple hats at BV Investments. Is your role as CFO shifting? What’s driving that shift?


Jonathan:
 My role is shifting, yes, and that’s natural for a growing firm. The smaller the firm, the more responsibility the CFO is going to have across various operations in the firm. As you grow, a combined CFO / CCO role (for example) may get split, while the CFO may formalize their ownership of valuations and portfolio monitoring, instead of splitting that duty with the investment team.

For my part, I have started to incorporate more and more interactions with and support for our portfolio companies’ management teams into my own day-to-day. Earlier this year, I held calls with our portfolio CFOs on various components of the CARES Act, and I regularly talk with management teams through cybersecurity, tax, insurance, and return-to-work planning.

In the future, my work will involve providing our portfolio company CFOs and even CTOs/CIOs with networks and forums to share best practices where they need it most. That next step should prove to be high-value for our portfolio companies.

Q: What keeps you up at night as we move into Q4 2020 and look to Q1 2021?


Jonathan: 
As a growing, scaling firm, we have a few priority-one operational areas of focus:

  1. Providing a white-glove service to our investors. This is about giving them the information they need, and be ‘best in class’ while we do it. We are embedding this approach in our internal portfolio management processes, and making sure we are only asking our own people to do things once, especially as they do more and more.
  2. Achieving transparency for our management team. With a growing portfolio of companies, we can’t be in touch with every deal at every second. How do we ensure our management keeps their finger on the pulse of what’s going on across the portfolio?
  3. Determining operational next steps in the evolving COVID-19 environment. We are preparing for changes in how we need to run our business for a longer-term period. We’re asking questions like: “How much longer will this go? Is there anything else we should be doing?”
  4. Keeping tabs on the 2020 U.S. General Election. We are watching closely to understand the potential impact to our portfolio. The reality is, from tax law to COVID and the economic recovery, either outcome will have a trickle-down effect across the entire country.

“Providing a white-glove service to our investors is about giving them the information they need, and be ‘best in class’ while we do it. We are embedding this approach in our internal portfolio management processes, and making sure we are only asking our own people to do things once.”

– Jonathan Holmes

 

Q: What are you seeing on the LP-GP relationship-management front?


Jonathan: 
It’s all about communication with our LPs. We are making sure they get the reporting they need, and, in particular, that we are responding to increasing cash flow information requests all GPs are getting now. Communication with our LPs has always been a priority, but, like everyone else, we’re working on getting it all done virtually, from our Annual Meeting, to new investor meetings.

That, by the way, ties into a bigger lesson for 2020: now more than ever, GP transparency with LPs is paramount. It’s not a new trend, but just as we saw in 2009, it’s critical to provide LPs with real-time updates on impact to portfolio companies, be clear about what you are seeing, and what the plan is. That ultimately keeps the trust between GP and LP, which is the priority.

blog

Cobalt Chart of the Month: October 2020

October 1, 2020

Cobalt Market Data / Chart of the Month

While buyout has been one of the most popular sectors in private equity over the past 10 years, often attracting huge sums of capital, its median return does not provide as strong of a benefit when compared to its loss ratio.  Follow-on strategies such as Co-Investment and Secondaries, while far less popular markets appear to show a greater median return for a lower average loss ratio.


Buyout vs. Secondaries and Co-Investment: Loss Ratio Across Sectors

 

Key Takeaways

  • Buyout appears to hold a respectable return profile that is consistent across various regions. The three largest regions (NA, EUW, and Global) attract more than $500 billion between them while holding a median IRR roughly in the 8-12% range.  At the same time, these regions’ buyout investments have generated a roughly 30% loss ratio meaning that a large portion of these investments will not return the invested capital.
  • By comparison, the follow-on investments in Global and NA have amassed less than $100 billion. Despite far less popularity, even the worst performing member (NA-Co-Investment) has the same median IRR as the buyout average (~10%) with less than half the loss ratio.  The Global secondaries group boasts an even higher median IRR, for around one third the loss ratio.  As such, far fewer Co-investment and Secondary groups exhibit unprofitable returns than buyout while those that do succeed also exhibit higher returns.

 

Looking Ahead:

  • Going forward, as more winning companies and funds are found, will these regions continue to dominate this clearly profitable marketplace, or will more developing regions be able to capture these gains as well?
  • Will such follow-on strategies continue to be profitable, or will increased competition lead to riskier and lower performing investments?
  • Could their performance be overshadowed by the continued trust in more conventional investment areas such as Buyout?
blog

Responding to investor and regulator scrutiny

September 25, 2020

Private equity and venture fund managers face an increasing barrage of detailed and probing questions daily. Examples:

  • “What is the exposure of your portfolio to a downturn in the transportation sector?”
  • “How many of your companies have published environmental sustainability plans?”
  • “Can you document how you arrived at that valuation?”

The source of this inquisition? Current investors, prospective new funders, and, sometimes, government regulators. In other words, people whose questions must be answered. Which is why VC and PE managers are spending ever more time on scavenger hunts through folders of spreadsheets, PDFs, and email chains.

And if you’re thinking there can’t help but be a better way, there is. Cloud-based portfolio monitoring platforms can now gather, analyze, and report the financial and performance data from every company in a VC or PE firm’s portfolio. Users of these systems extoll their time savings, error reduction and risk-management improvements. And, not least, such platforms make it much easier to respond to investor questions, due diligence reviews, and regulatory inquiries.

Here’s what these groups are asking for most, and where a portfolio monitoring solution can help firms give it to them:

Potential Investors

They want: High return with mitigated risk and a way to pick among the many funds competing for their dollars.

  • Due diligence by institutional investors often searches for signs of operational risk, such as technology that presents inaccurate or out-of-date information.

Portfolio monitoring can:
Create structure and precision in fund operations.
  • Systems and procedures used to document the flow of funds, as well as portfolio company performance, should be well documented and consistently applied.
  • Information needed to answer questions that come up in due diligence or ongoing requests from investors should be readily available in a customized, centralized platform without the need for manual calculations.

Current LPs

They want: Deeper understanding of what they invested in.

  • Investors are no longer satisfied with standard quarterly reports.
  • They expect information on a wide range of concerns, proactive notification of portfolio issues, and immediate answers to any question they think of.
  • Many are also concerned about the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics of the companies in their portfolios.


Portfolio monitoring can: 
Provide real-time answers and insights.

  • Build dashboards that can calculate concentrations of exposure, components of return, and comparison to relevant benchmarks.
  • Tracking system for measures of progress by portfolio companies against ESG goals.

 

Regulators

They want: Compliance with regulations meant to protect investors and the public.

  • The Securities and Exchange Commission is increasingly checking whether the valuations used by private fund managers are based on standard accounting principles, consistently applied, and scrupulously documented.


Portfolio monitoring can: 
Provide evidence that valuations are not arbitrary or manipulated.

  • Any portfolio monitoring system used to track indicators used in valuations should include an audit trail that can document the source of each number and when it was modified.

 

To understand more about the capabilities of portfolio monitoring platforms and how to select the best one for your firm, download our quick and easy guide here.

blog

Cobalt Chart of the Month: August 2020

August 7, 2020

Cobalt Market Data Chart of the Month

Pooled Distributions/Contributions of Distressed Credit Funds from 2005 to 2019

This chart emphasizes the popularity of distressed credit funds during the 2008 recession, and how this run-up was followed by an immediate correction in Q1 of 2009. After the correction, contributions were relatively stable for the following decade, but did exhibit periods of volatility such as that seen in late 2015.

Key Takeaways:

  • The total commitments to distressed credit funds in 2020 will likely mirror the sharp increase as seen from 2007 to the end of 2008. This is likely because many investors see the current economic situation as a major investment opportunity; they can either help resolve existing debts for companies that continue to operate as usual, or they are willing to take the risk that coronavirus will be over before many distressed companies go completely under.
  • Profitable and innovative companies that were thriving before COVID-19 are already burning cash from an inability to conduct virtual business, creating a wide variety of distressed opportunities. If companies continue to bleed cash and incorporate more debt without adjusting to virtual business, investors will be forced to back out or reinforce their positions to prevent bankruptcy.
  • Investing in distressed credit today has new risks compared to 2008. The recovery period could potentially be longer depending on the duration of the coronavirus, and the current economic situation will continue to disrupt business for an uncertain amount of time until there is a vaccine or treatment.

Looking Ahead:

  • Will the uncertainty of COVID-19 and the unease involved with reopening business shape the performance of these distressed credit funds?
  • Will the saturation of distressed credit funds impact the rate of bankruptcy in the coming year?
  • Will we see an immediate run on these funds or will it take a few quarters to make the shift?
  • Will follow-on and double-down funds exercise caution or aggressively back potential gems within their portfolio?
blog

Cobalt Chart of the Month: July 2020

July 1, 2020

Cobalt Market Data Chart of the Month

NAVs and Dry Powder in the 2010’s

This chart indicates that from 2012 to 2018, in the recovery following the 2008 recession, dry powder and NAVs had seen a fairly parallel growth. However, dry powder plateaued at the end of 2018 and remained flat throughout 2019. Meanwhile, NAVs have continued to climb.

Key Takeaways:

  • If these two key metrics continue to separate, more money will likely be deployed in attractive deals in a down market, similar to what we saw post-2008 when NAVs began to separate from dry powder.
  • Climbing NAVs are indicative of growing holding periods and asset prices in funds over the past decade
  • If dry powder continues to plateau, this could shorten deployment cycles, or it’s potentially a signal that the amount of deals in the market are moving roughly in line with new commitments being made from LPs.

Looking Ahead:

  • Will we see NAVs continue to outpace dry powder in the near future, similar to the post-2008 landscape?
  • What does this trend mean for the market heading into the COVID crash of early 2020?
  • Will a less frothy market heading into the downturn blunt the impact on the PE market?
blog

How To Get a PE Tech Implementation Right

June 25, 2020

While deploying new technology will always require a level of effort and work, there are some key steps you can take to make an implementation as quick and painless as possible.

1. Designate a Project Manager/Champion who will get it done. Implementing software that will change the day-to-day flow and rhythm of your company can involve organizing a lot of data and coordinating a bunch of moving parts. By appointing a project manager who dedicates a certain amount of their time to keep the implementation on track from your side, you’ll ensure nothing falls through the cracks.And remember: we aren’t talking about a power-user here. That’s a different concept requiring a level of complexity you should never need in technology designed to make your job easier.

2. Outline Tangible Goals that go beyond dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s. Oftentimes, completing an implementation can feel anticlimactic because a clear desired result wasn’t outlined at the start of the process. By setting specific goals like: “80% of investor reporting will be created and delivered through the software this quarter” or: “all portfolio company data for year-end will be reported through the new online platform”, you’ll have measurable goals and distinct ways to tell if your implementation was a success or a failure.

3. Set a Realistic and Firm Timeline for your software implementation. While you’re going to want to see value from your new technology as soon as possible, make sure you assess the current state of your data before signing off on a timeline. It’s not uncommon for implementations to fall behind or fall apart because a firm did not realize how disorganized and disparate their data was. Informed decisions and deadlines always work out better in the long run.

4. Drive Internal Adoption by using the new technology for both internal and external needs. For example, you want to be able to create reports for both internal meetings and external needs, like LP requests or fundraising. Internal adoption is key for continued success with any given platform, but expect some resistance up front. Operational changes take time and require reinforcement.

Tech adoption is becoming critical to many firms’ success as they seek to automate processes around portfolio company data collection and reporting. Cobalt’s Implementation and Support teams are here to help your firm get the ball rolling. Get in touch with us to get started.

 

blog

Four Big PE Tech Implementation MYTHS

June 25, 2020

In the age of automation, it’s inevitable that private market firms of all sizes will have to implement new technology in order to keep up with the market. Many firms have a reputation of being hesitant to adopt new technology internally: most of us are reliant on Excel, so the idea of moving out of it can create panic. In reality, though, new technology doesn’t need to replace your current process; rather, the right solution should enhance it, and lighten your workload.

Whatever your technology strategy, it’s the implementations that feel tough, even though the payoff at the end is huge. But what’s real and what’s just fear-inducing industry rumor?

Read on as we break down four common misconceptions about private equity tech implementations, and then four key factors to getting it right.

Myth #1: A new PE tech solution is going to drain my IT department.

Reality check: You do not necessarily need to commit a lot of IT resources to implementing a new solution; many good ones provide support to complement your own capabilities.

The trick is to be thoughtful about your selection and involve a small team at the start of the implementation process, and make sure they are held accountable for a successful implementation and adoption process.

Myth #2: New PE tech means I need to warehouse our data.

Reality check: Most firms don’t need a data warehouse to store all the data from their CRM, portfolio companies, and accounting. With that said, once you get to a certain size, dealing with multiple asset classes (i.e. Real Estate + Credit + Hedge + Private Equity), you may hit a tipping point where it might make sense to invest in data warehousing.

Myth #3: The cost of new PE tech is astronomical.

Reality check: Cost is relative, and an incremental change can often feel larger than it actually is. If you’re looking at investing in a new technology suite, and that investment represents 2x the current spend, you need to look at what you are currently spending. Is it just Quickbooks and Excel? Or something more? Remember that when you consider headcount savings, economies of scale often begin to prove out as you achieve higher AUM-per-full-time-employee.

Myth #4: I’ll buy a shiny new tool, and it’ll fall apart immediately.

Reality check: You invest in the tool, but you still need to invest time in considering how data flows through your organization, and how data processes should evolve.

Hint: The answer should not be: “let’s copy paste from Excel into the new system.” Be thoughtful on how things should change as you implement a new system and think about how to empower your organization to fuel efficiency.

While deploying new technology will always require a level of effort and work, there are some key steps you can take to make an implementation as quick and painless as possible.

Read: How to get a Tech Implementation Right

blog

2020 Forecast in The Shredder? It’s Time to Automate

May 27, 2020

If you are focused on producing and (constantly) updating forecasts for your firm right now, you are not alone. In the midst of uncertainty driven by the coronavirus, many private equity and venture capital firms are more closely monitoring portfolio health, asking:

  • Which of our portfolio companies need cash, NOW?
  • Which ones can stand on their own two feet longer?
  • Can / should we reallocate resources to support our portfolio companies’ health?

Forecasting isn’t new to the private markets, and during a market dislocation, this shorter-term financial watch and responsive reallocation strategy is the smartest move.

“Good forecasting hygiene supports the stability play that, in theory, every private equity firm should have in their strategic playbook,” says Cobalt CEO Jason Weinstein. “With COVID-19, we’ve seen many firms issue an entirely new set of scenarios to account for updated definitions of ‘bad, worse, and worst.’”

So what should your forecasting report include? Let’s take a look.

 

Anatomy of a Good Private Equity Forecast

Most forecasting reports account for some combination of the following metrics:

  • Cash flows: How often do you update your cash flow and income statements to stay on top of the numbers?
  • Employee growth: How will your portfolio company’s workforce grow (or shrink) in the next 30-180 days?
  • ESG metrics: What will your cost of energy be in the next month? What about water use? Impact to your portfolio company’s surrounding communities in any shift?
  • Additional investments and/or alternative capital: Where do you anticipate making additional investments? Do you plan on issuing debt or applying a new structure to your investment?

As with everything, forecasting is not a “one-and-done” process. Best practice dictates that they be updated on a regular basis, to account for material changes to any of these metrics.

Source: Cobalt GP

 

A More Efficient Way to Forecast

Private equity reporting can be an onerous and time-consuming task: LP and management requests for information are more frequent and detailed than ever — and then there are the tools you use to produce them.In order to efficiently and easily manage your forecasts, you’ll likely want to pull forecasts together from one centralized system. This is all the more critical as team members collaborate from afar.

Solutions you’ll want to consider will include these critical features, automated:

  • Metrics versions to uniquely compare actual versus projected KPIs (i.e. Revenue, EBITDA, Income). A good solution will allow you to graph metrics versions automatically and in real-time.
  • Variance analysis, so that you can compare actual metrics versus a selection of scenarios, whether those are investment cases, high-/mid-/low-risk scenarios, or even outcomes based on whether a vaccine to COVID-19 is developed in 6, 12, or 18 months.
  • A “Dashboard View” so that you can see, in one shot, the critical information you need to know at the click of a button, including how much longer a given portfolio company can operate with cash on hand, and quick-take calculations on key scenarios (i.e. workforce distribution shifts or production slow-downs).
  • Sharing for easy, remote team collaboration, and even export to PDF for quick-turnaround distribution to management and LPs.
blog

Signs You Need Better Portfolio Monitoring Than Excel

April 28, 2020

Eight Signs You’ve Outgrown Excel for Portfolio Monitoring

Excel has traditionally been an easy (and natural) way to track portfolio companies, particularly when your fund was smaller, and perhaps less complex.

As your fund grows, however, you are likely installing technology to manage back-office tasks (i.e. accounting software for finance and a CRM system for the deal team). But none of that manages your “crown-jewel” front-office information: the data showing your portfolio company performance metrics and valuations.

So how do you know it’s time to upgrade from Excel to a proper portfolio monitoring platform? Here are eight tell-tale signs that it’s time to do just that.

1. It takes longer than five minutes to find something.

“Yes, I know the LP is on the phone. That number is on one of these tabs. Or possibly on the other spreadsheet. Can you stall while I look.”

2. You want to evaluate your entire portfolio for risk.

“Don’t a few of our companies have factories where that war is about to escalate? Have we scenarioed how that could affect our results?”

3. You have to restart a meeting when you realize people are looking at different versions of a spreadsheet.

“It says here inventory is down to a 10-day supply…Wait, what update? I’m reading version 3.2, when was it changed?”

4. You’re worried about an upcoming audit.

“I’m sure that valuation was based on the revenue projection they gave us. You know, the one before they lowered it. Don’t we have a record of the old numbers somewhere?”

5. Only one person knows how your ‘master spreadsheet’ works.

“A three-week honeymoon? How will we get the reports out?”

6. Your investor reports look like they were made in Excel.

“What do you mean BlackRock doesn’t have grid lines on its reports?”

7. It takes weeks of chasing to get all the information for a quarterly report.

“I don’t care how good that oil-services business looks. No new deals if we can’t keep track of the ones we’ve done already. Get me those numbers now.”

8. Everyone knows you need a portfolio monitoring system, but you think it would be too difficult to set up.

“I’m sorry, but we just don’t have the bandwidth to accomodate a software install.”

 

If you’ve heard anything like the above at your firm, it’s time to check out portfolio monitoring software. Imagine being able to open your laptop, tap the name of one of your portfolio companies, and see all the information you want—up-to-date, consistent, and with all changes tracked. You’ll be able to analyze trends across the entire portfolio, identify risk, and compare each company’s performance to your investment thesis. And your LPs will notice that you answer their questions faster and send crisp, professional reports.

And about that install… Not every software package is a time-suck delivery system. Spend half a morning calling a few peers and you’ll quickly learn that some portfolio monitoring packages are surprisingly fast to install and easy to use. When you see how much time your team regains once it is freed from juggling those old-school spreadsheets, the only thing you’ll be wondering is why you stuck with Excel as long as you did.

blog

Cobalt GP has a new look. Here’s why.

February 12, 2020

Simplicity. Sophistication. Usability. Service.

These are the four mantras at the core of every thing we do at Cobalt. Simply put, it was time that the way we talk about and present our business actually represents those mantras—and the experience our clients enjoy on our GP platform.

So we got to work designing everything from our logo to our website to tell the story of what Cobalt really does, and why.

With that in mind, some fun facts about our new look:

  1. Yes, our logo is a wave. A modern, tech-forward look at a wave. That’s because Cobalt is the tool of choice of private equity and venture capital teams navigating change across their operating environment. That change spans internal controls, LP expectations, and competitive landscapes. Cobalt helps those teams simplify, speed up, and get more effective at riding that wave, and even putting it in a box they can check. See what we did there?
  2. Our color palette is advanced and fluid. We aren’t your standard financial services technology company, because we’re nimble and forward-looking. We work hard to stay at the forefront of industry changes, so you can too. That’s why we landed on an unusual color palette that serves more as a metaphor for what we do for our clients: at its foundation, it is dependable and deep, but we reserve the ability to tailor it to our clients’ needs, grab attention, or highlight the most important information.
  3. We feature a lot of people. Gone are the illustrated, mannequin-esque images, and conceptual “icons.” Instead, we’ve placed people front and center in our new visual identity. As we mentioned above, service is our top priority. We are available to our clients any time they need, to troubleshoot or find a new path in finding and assessing the data they need. Person to person. Front and center.

 

The new look is still a work in progress: important things like our library of white papers, cheat sheets, and industry observations will continue to be added to our Resources section as we continue to update them. Check back regularly for old favorites, and new ones.

In the meantime, we’d love to know your thoughts about our new look, or answer any questions you have. Feel free to reach out to us directly, and a team member will get back to you within one business day: info@cobaltgp.com.